In your kitchen cabinet, you’ve probably got a spray bottle with an adjustable nozzle. If you twist the nozzle one way, it sprays a 
fine mist into the air.
You twist the nozzle the other way, it squirts a jet of water in a straight line.
You turn that nozzle to the exact position you want so you can wash a mirror, clean up a spill, or whatever.
If the universe had expanded a little faster, the matter would have sprayed out into space like fine mist from a water bottle – so fast, a gazillion particles of dust would speed into infinity and never even form a single star.If the universe had expanded just a little slower, the material would have dribbled out like big drops of water, then collapsed back where it came from by the force of gravity.
A little too fast, and you get a meaningless spray of fine dust. A little too slow, and the whole universe collapses back into one big black hole.
The surprising thing is just how narrow the difference is – the fine tuning of the Big Bang.
To strike the perfect balance between too fast and too slow, the force, something that physicists call “the Dark Energy Term” had to be accurate to one part in ten with 120 zeros. If you wrote this as a decimal, the number would look like this:
0.000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000 0000000000000000000000000000001
In their paper “Disturbing Implications of a Cosmological Constant” two atheist scientists from Stanford University stated that the existence of this dark energy term would have required a miracle… “An unknown agent” intervened in cosmic history “for reasons of its own.”
Just for comparison, the best human engineering example is the Gravity Wave Telescope, which was built with a precision of 23 zeros.
The Designer, the ‘external agent’ that caused our universe must possess an intellect, knowledge, creativity and power trillions and trillions of times greater than we humans have. Absolutely amazing.
Now a person who doesn’t believe in God has to find some way to explain this.
One of the more common explanations seems to be “There was an infinite number of universes, so it was inevitable that things would have turned out right in at least one of them.”
The “infinite universes” theory is truly an amazing theory. Just think about it, if there is an infinite number of universes, then absolutely everything is not only possible… It’s actually happened!
It means that somewhere, in some dimension, there is a universe where the Chicago Cubs won the World Series last year. There’s a universe where Justin Bieber becomes President of the United States.
There’s even a universe where Elvis kicks his drug habit and still resides at Graceland and sings at concerts.
Imagine the possibilities!
I might sound like I’m joking, but actually I’m dead serious. To believe an infinite number of universes made life possible by random chance is to believe everything else I just said, too.
Some people believe in God with a capital G.
And some folks believe in Chance with a Capital C.
Respectfully Submitted,
Perry Marshall
The Fine Tuning of the Universe by Physicist Dr. Gerald Schroeder
Download The First 3 Chapters of Evolution 2.0 For Free, Here – https://evo2.org/evolution/Where Did Life And The Genetic Code Come From? Can The Answer Build Superior AI? The #1 Mystery In Science Now Has A $10 Million Prize. Learn More About It, Here – https://www.herox.com/evolution2.0
sir,
can you tell me how did black hole orginated and its characteristics??
You can easily find answers to these kinds of questions with a Google search, Wikipedia etc.
can anyone find out what was there before the big bang came about.what were the energies which synergised to make it happen.we havenot even touched a drop of water from the ocean of mysteries which are there to be discovered.
Dear Mr Perry,
it is a big pleasure to me that i joined your site; its extravagantly wonderful!
moreover,
if the 10^500 universes are likely to occur, then at the initial conditions these “fake” universes will constitute a major disturbance to our well-tuned universe and thus destroying the vehicle of life!
inaddition:
considering multiuniverses, athiests are proclaiming the infinite motion of the quantum fluctuations, which is a logical fallacy, because considering the latter, it is possible to have a universe at the boarders at our universe and thus collapsing it and destroying life.
please cmment on my view.
bazzy,
Bazzy,
Any theory that requires infinite fluctuations of an infinite number of things is not parsimonious; your are right.
Perry
It is said that Evolution started 4.6 billion years ago.
If each step of Evoution were compressed into a 12 hour clock, it would help put things in perspective, it would be easier to understand.
The Formation of earth would start at 12 noon. Life would begin in a form similar to Bacteria at 3,5 Billion Years ago, – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – -@2:52
Photosynthetic bacteria appear about 2.billion years ago – – – – – – – – – @3:48.
Multicelled plants & animal appear about 1 Billion years ago – – – – – – @9:24
Crustaceans appear around 650 Million years ago – – – – – – – – – – – – – -@10:18
Fish appear appear around 510 Million years ago – – – – – – – – – – – – – – @10:40
Land plants appear 420 Million years ago – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – -@10:54
Insects appear 380 Million years ago – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – @11:00
Seed Plants and Amphibians appear around 360 Million years ago – @11:03
Reptiles appear around 340 Million years ago – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – @11:07
Mammals appear around 213 Million years ago – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – @11:27
Birds appear around 150 Million years ago – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – -@ 11:36
Flowering Plants appear around 140 Million years ago – – – – – – – – – – -@ 11:38
Humans appear around 2 Million years ago – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – @ 11:59:41
Religion came into being about 1,500 to 2,000 years ago – – – @ 11:59:9999996.
All of the above information has been scientifically proven except for Religion.
Dear Johnny B. :
Science cannot prove much of anything and not one word of what you posted in anything more that conjecture. Just because a belief is popular with scientists does not change the fact it is only a belief.
Evolution is an ancient anti-God religion , it was practiced by the ancient Babylonians, the Greeks, the Romans etc etc.
There is far more scientific evidence that points to a young earth and it is ignored for religious reasons, atheism is a belief.
In my lifetime the popular belief among secular scientist of the age of the earth has doubled and since 1800 has increased 6 magnitudes. You have built your house on shifting sand.
Here is a test for you, name one solitary law of science or one solitary branch of science founded by an atheist, I will save you the trouble , there are none.
Science is based on the belief that God is an orderly creator.
Dear Mr. Marshall,
I have reviewed your series of writings 1,2,3 about the universe _ this one was the third; tomorrow will come the fourth etc. Please keep up the writings _ very interesting articles to read upon. Thanks.
I found my comment and questions on the 1st issue was not answered by you _neither by your staff at the web neither in emails, what’s wrong please advise. My comment and questions were further deleted at your web. Advise your errors ??
I was a graduate from U of W, Seattle, WA, USA 1977; mayor Science & Engineering _ in particular to be precise BSEE. My tech expertise went on to 30 years of applications at Oil & Gas Production _ US Oil Company & Operator in Indonesia ” Roy M Huffington “. I am now retired. So I had been very interested in Science, Engineering Applications and Development; the whole series of that from EE, Computer, Nuclear, Physics, Chemistry, Aeronautics _ & Aero Dynamics, Space Craft, Rockets _ & Launch Technology, the whole bids; thence on to Project Management, Cost & Scheduling, Drives & Applications at Oil & Gas Field Productions and Management as Turbine Tech _ Gas, Steam, Electric Drives, Fabrication, Manufacturing, Control Systems & Panels, Wireless Tech ETC _ and now Intelligence _ with in the Scope of Information Technology.
So _ What do you guys know and have noticed; How big is the universe, has been and dimensions ?? Dimensionless, no boundary, no limits, infinity ?? Yes _ That is right or about right ?? Can you know now to be sure ?? Who draw those pictures in Hypothesis _ the Solar Systems , the Milky Galaxy _ even the Andromeda, the Virgo ETC.The Hubell composite imagings Systems ?? Computer software _ Some thing more advanced thence the Photo Shops ? Yes perhaps and may be not ?? Very clever and very smart as well fascinating or some body else will alsop say full of illusions ?? Come on guys I am not arguing against that.
And now the science and development in theorems _ the Big Bangs, the Black Holes, the Quasars, the Nebulaes ETC _ very interesting Yes. Let’s go back ward to the ancient _ who developed the therom of Atoms _ the Great Mr. Bohr ?? Great _ but unlucky I have seen nothing and witnessed nothing in lab what the Atom of Hydrogen or Copper really look like _ you can’t see them. Can you or have you been _ seen _ and witnessed upon them, physically, or electronically direct or indirect ?? Please advise if I have been missing them _ so my apology. You will know that thence better.
Here is the point _ I don’t argue against science and development _ I don’t have enough access and knowledge about them to be complete. So Most of us will have a little bit here and there _ none is complete _ we don’t know all, yes perhaps some here and there are partials.
Back to the main issue now _ the universe; You guys know all ?? Perhaps most likely not. Partials _ a little _ perhaps Yes _ but please don’t say you don’t, that will be showing ignorance _ thence we should not go on this discussion.
For the very little bids of informations _ you guys should know by now _ the universe is very big; beyond ratio of comparison _ if you will have any reasons to believe you will not be able to compare against anything. Here is the character to state _ boundless, no boundary, limitless, infinity; Have you heard this terms ” GHAIB ” _ it is an Arabic term _ perhaps will translate to English _ ” No word is capable of descriptions ” _ so that will be scriptless.
Still not enough _ you want to continue to debate _ by all means _ but I am off _ I will not take the stand to argue against any body _ neither believe nor religions. You guys all are entiltled to what you will want to say. That will be your rights.
I would suggest _ before closing shortly _ open up your mind to the horizon _ read ” Intelligence ” with in the scope of Information Technology “. They will be all arround you. You can read the media, the web, the Perry Marshall publications, the Bible, the Genesis, the series in religions if you believe in them _ such as the Hindus said of their God of Whisnu ETC. Leave them intact, that will be their rights to do so and as such. I would also suggest you guys to start reading Qur’an. Information Tech _ of the Universe is there; You will be challenged to read on and further to find out the details _ in science ? Yes use science development as part of the tools to develop your conscience, comprehension and understanding.
Thence now come the catch _ The universe is thence so big _ the earth and the Solar Systems and human living on planet earth ? they are great creatures given the rights, intelligence and opportunity living on earth landscape; but they are so small and so tiny and power less in relative sense _ just simplest anology as colonies of small ants in the middle of huge foot ball fields ??
Now what all those fuss and theorems _ Science of the Big Bangs, Black Holes, Quasars ETC. Great Science to start with in attempt for the small human and civilzation to understand things as where human comes from and where to go ??
Check this statement _ Some human intelligence will say they come from nowhere and ending up neither no where on earth let alone as well with in the scope in the universe _ meaning they disappear just like that when they die. It may appear this kind of statement is naif _ may not be so intelligent at all or after all. But please don’t blame those guys in the category, leave them alone.
This next statement will be different and probably better _ they come from God Creation _ and they go back to their God upon dying. Will this sound better and make more sense thence the first one above ?? You guys please decide your comment and answers.
Final _ closing comment _ So if you will say you guys come and go back to your creator God for the good and the bad as well of what you had committed and done upon lives while on earth?? What do you say about the universe _ thence will all those theorems of Big Bangs etc be still relevant to discuss ?? Remember your guys are just like the colonies of small ants found in the huge foot ball fields. It may appear all those theorems will fall with in the scope of no ants to discuss. Pardon me if I will have said it wrong which will be offensive to some of you guys perhaps.
Advise comment.
Thanks & Regards,
Iskandar Ibrahim
Hi there Perry.
I have been waiting for you. For a long time I have had a similar theory about God’s creation, but not in so much detail and only in feeling.
I have read most of your theories; cant wait to read the rest, there is just too much to go through all at once.
There is one observation I would like to make reading through the comments made in the freethought and rationalism blog.
In the beginning of the discussion the talk went over my head, even after I read all their links to their findings. The further I read and the more laymen the parties concerned spoke the easier it became to understand.
At a stage it was mentioned that you kept on shifting the goal posts, I would argue that these goal posts were not placed there by you but in fact by the biologists and scientists of our intelligent human race. Your findings are based on facts that were founded on the evidence produced by these intelligent minds of the biologists and scientists.
For me its not only how Big God can create, but how small he can create to fill the whole void of the creation, which we now know is no void at all and consists of all kinds of energy.
We as a human race will for a long time to come keep finding new and exciting small discoveries of his creation!!!!
Thank you.
Here is a very important question disregarded, that is relationship between human self arised firom his experiences and the fact.
Dear Mr. Marshall
I did not understood one thing , you have written that an atheist tries to seek an explanation. Then I think it is good that atheist is at least rational and logical and it is on these lines science is based, and not like a believer who puts everything not understood under the title “God”. In fact God begins where humans touch their limitations and as far you can seek and have the potential to move on, the lesser you rely on God and more in yourself. To believe in God is to cover up your limitations. Instead one should say that, “It’s this I know, or known by mankind and we are still understanding the rest. It is absolutely unbelievable to believe that something came from nothing or God is the engineer. Then how that engineer came into being, from emptiness or nothing?
Regards
Jyoti
Who designed the designer? See
http://evo2.org/faq/#designer
and
Who made God? http://evo2.org/infotheoryqa.htm
Any view you embrace requires an uncaused cause.
Is the Big Bang the beginning of time?
http://evo2.org/faq/#time
There is NO SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE to support a creator or god. EVOLUTION on the other hand has been pretty well proven by SCIENCE.
You don’t seem to have read anything on this website. Please come back when you are willing to participate in this discussion.
My understanding is that there are scientists who say that the Big Bang theory is busted. For a non scentific and simple minded person like myself, when I read your article that says ” a gazillion particles of dust would speed into infinity and never even form a single star.” What would make this dust (or gases) begin to swirl and form stars?
Just wondering
Because the gases expanded at a proper speed, they were able to gravitationally attract each other and form stars.
Respected Perry Marshall,
What was the state of Universe before Big Bang?
Q: Is the big bang the beginning of time?
A: From the standpoint of everything within our universe, yes.
Einstein’s Spacetime theorems combine space and time into a single continuum. The expansion of space corresponds to the forward movement of time. At the moment of the Big Bang, the universe occupies an infinitely small space. Extrapolation of the expansion of the universe backwards in time using general relativity yields an infinite density and temperature at a finite time in the past.
As we move from the present to the moment of the Big Bang, general relativity breaks down prior to t=10^-43 seconds (”Planck time.”). Between t=0 and Planck time we are unable to investigate the exact progress of the Big Bang.
Prior to t=0 there is no such thing as time. Time itself begins literally at the point of the Big Bang.
There may be other dimensions of time and other universes but we have no access to them or knowledge of them.
In 1931, astronomer Georges Lemaître suggested that the evident expansion in forward time required that the universe contracted backwards in time, and would continue to do so until it could contract no further, bringing all the mass of the universe into a single point, a “primeval atom”, at a point in time before which time and space did not exist. As such, at this point, the fabric of time and space had not yet come into existence.
It is not logical to conclude that matter and energy existed before that since there is no “before.”
This has an interesting correspondence to Genesis 1:1: “In the beginning [of time] God created [out of nothing] the heavens and the earth [everything].”
You’ve heard of the theory of multiple big bangs? It could be that there were a billion billion “failed” big bangs- but one got it right. If the universe does actually crunch, then every failure could, after it, have a crunch and another big bang.
-DTV
Which is an appeal to a large number of things that no one has ever observed.
Perry
You’re right. It’s based upon mathematical predictions, of the same sort that you use as evidence of this theory.
Please show us the mathematical formula that produces coded information and communication systems.
I like your arguments. But evolution never tried to explain how life began.
Anyway, can you give any simple, scientific theory of how life began?
“If you can read this, I can prove God exists” – http://evo2.org/ifyoucanreadthis.htm – listen to the whole thing, por favor.
Well gang, it seems pretty simple and clear cut to me. “God” set evrything into motion at the “Big Bang”. The universe, galaxies, solar systems all were sent pinning about from that specific point in time.
Whe time was right “God” introduced different species, plants, animals, insects as well as all the sub-species- fish, birds and so on.
Each specie had served its purpose. For example the ancient folliage collapsed, and through movements of the Earth, its tectonic plates, eventually interned this material, baked it under pressure, and time and at the “right moment” it was discovered it could be used as combustable- replacing the diminishing whale population used in ancient lamps.
At that time our limited technology allowed us to modify its preoperties and its composition and we have since converted it into fuel for vehicles, plastics, polymers, but now we have arrived at a new threshold. One where our technology is being called upon to use existing resources, “renewable resources” to replace what we used to have fossil fuels- hydrocarbons, and now we know how to take advantage of the Sun, Geo-thermal, wind, wave, and nuclear energy (in a clean mode) but we must put greed behind us.
the possibilty exists that we could charge our future cars through a household unit which charges during the day, and then charge our car at night. Wind farms are another viable source, not to mention the never ceasing wave action on the ocean.
We have the talent, the resources, the technology to take advantage of these gifts, but we must seperate from our profit oriented organizations which serve more often to slow us down rather than to advance matters to our actual needs.
Our position at this time is between two vias to travel upon…
That is we can persue methods which minimize or eliminate our demands upon the environment, or we can continue in our erroneous ways and face extinction.
But keeping in mind “God” had always placed matters at our feet at “Just the right time”, we have the option now to procede and adapt to conditions , take advantage of God´s resources, or, face, to our doom, the reduction of the human condition becasue of our irresponsable and greddy needs and wants, which will leave only a few hanging around to account to future generations.
We also need to “Adapt” to changing conditions. Mankind has always been able to adapt. In many cases this is by using common sense, others is by desperation and technology.
We need leaders who have the wisdom to guide us along our way to recover from our mistaken decisions of the past, and , again, “we” must anticipate yet the next step in harvesting energy.This is not the end and final answer.
As for global warming…well, considering that global warming has been occuring for millions of years, at least eleven cycles which we can document, this to should be considered a natural event albeit out of our control.
Humankind must think os way to Adapt, circumvent these phenomena.
I just wish somebody who was wise and considered the holistic appoarch instead of the fly on the Mona Lisa scenario.
We have only been in the business of recording weather (locally what is more) for maybe the last 100 years. How is it possible we consider trends in the past which encompass periods millions of years.
Our presence, our existence represents less than the width of a hair…on a timeline 100 miles long.
If this doesn´t help to serve to put things into perspective…frankly I couldn´t explain it another way. One drop of water in the ocean, a speck of dust in the air…of the entire world.
So, thins come about as part of “design”, that is to say even before the Big Bang there was a plan. And you know what??? this is a story without end. Because if there was an end, that would mean the end of God, and that my friend ain´t going to happen.
Wake up and smell the science…
Let´s simply use some dumb-level math, some science, some facts, and our minds.
I´m just an engineer. (Aerospace-automotive)and logistics expert/Consultant etc.
Time as just one factor doesn´t permit the possibility of evolution.
Species preference is another factor which inhibits the possibility of evolution.Usually the “odd” ones are cast out and die long before they can pass their genes onto the next genartion, a factor which I have never even seen approached. Specie-behavoral science has not been mentioned.
Until the last decades have we actually given support to special defects which occur, babies without arms,legs, other defects- which now many are treatable and other defects can be adapted to or circumvented using new technology.
In the past, these people would have perished quickly.
We have not had any changes that we are aware of for the past 60,000 years at least that we know of. Fossilixed remains are few and far between, and the “stretches” of some scientists (with hopeful imaginations) are way out there, beyond the Moon.
The major changes that have been noted are those by an improving diet (Let´s eliminate Mc Donald´s from this) but, it´s been most notable in 3rd world nations, but it´s not in the form of extra fingers, elimination of fins and gills (give me a break please!) rather, they have attained the physical stature of “western world” peoples. Are you a mutant? I don´t think I am, yes, I´m 6´4″ tall, but my lineage comes from Germany and all my direct family members are tall-Have I evolved? Er, no.
My conclusions are based on observation, studying historical evidence, and , yes, watching Discovery Channel. But, maybe I have evolved. I can think for myself! I am not like the sheep who follow the crowd. What is your opinion?
simply tell that .does all evidances that the astronomy and the advance science provides support the non-existance of God
sir,
i do believe in the concept called GOD.but some of my perceptions depicts that the concept GOD might be personified because a superior entity in an environment cannot think beyond it..(eg:- a lion thinks that he is the superior animal in the forest).so we humans also might restrict to ourself saying that humans are the superior .to realise the existence of the super power the GODS have been personified.In hindu religion there are many gods with lion faced(called as narasimha) ,horse faced(called as hayagriva)…etc…
as there is no evidence of their existence except my grandma’s stories,i lead to this conclusion!
Hey, all you out there from physics and chemistry- remember KISS (Keep It Simple Stupid) or , of you prefer reduce things to the least common denominator. You chose.
Can anyone think that the universe and its continuing expansion, with a “fixed” amount of matter (remember elements convert, transform, but the amount of matter and energy remain the same in the universe [as far as we know]) However, the laws of physics are altered at sub-atomic levels because of gravity.
Gravity falls apart at sub-atomic levels, there simply isn´t sufficient mass to enforce the laws of attraction.
Well, enough of that rhetoric, I am able to accept the simple that God- (as each one interprets God) had a long time ago-(time being insignificant to God) Set about the sequence of events, from the “Big-Bang” to “OUR” current time (Time being the fourth demension and we only occupy the “NOW” portion of time)
We “oxidize”, that is we get older, withing the existing laws of physics (Er, our laws “we” have established)…I could complicate this issue a lot.
Having a doctorate in physics and chemistry (which came first the chicken or the egg?) I have been able to observe, anylize, absorb listen to many disciplines and theories and thoughts…My GREAT CONCLUSION IS: GOD MADE THIS WHOLE THING HAPPEN. it would take a googalplex of hypercomputers to have done the calculations…and then who would enact the calculations to make them reality???
So, I regress to my King James, and find much comfort, even knowing that hundreds of years ago the Vatican filed many books away in its achives because it was inconvenient for that church.
I have learned to “accept” what is in front of me, later I question and find answers. The important is find answers, and when you run into a block wall, as we often do, we knock on the wall and see who answers.
Having a very disabling disease, I learned a lot, investigated a lot since 1977.I found many answers…some answers which would make some people uncomfortable, me, I just kept searching-digging and I still come up with the same solution…God made the whole thing happen.
Chuck, I agree with your GREAT CONCLUSION: GOD MADE THIS WHOLE THING HAPPEN. I do not agree with your statement: “which came first the chicken or the egg?” …it was the chicken… look at the chicken legs skin, they look like reptiles skin, so the reproduction organs evolved first, but hey you have a doctorate in physics and chemistry… not in biology 🙂
Here’s a verse from Quran regarding this subject:
021.030
YUSUFALI: Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined together (as one unit of creation), before we clove them asunder? We made from water every living thing. Will they not then believe?
PICKTHAL: Have not those who disbelieve known that the heavens and the earth were of one piece, then We parted them, and we made every living thing of water? Will they not then believe?
http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/quran/021.qmt.html
respected sir,
today in my mail i read about multiple universe theory,my question is wether is it possible for all of them to co-exist in oue single universe meaning we have a definite time frame and other one has different time frame so we are unable to see it????or may be theris a barrier between these co-existing universes?????
If multiple universes exist then it is impossible for us to detect them.
what do you mean by the existence of many universes? Do they exist out of only one source? if so what is the source?
I don’t think there’s any particular reason to believe that there are many universes. The source of 1 or all universes is necessarily God.